The Playbook / Clause 5

Assignment & Subletting

Assignment; Subletting; Change of Control; Permitted Transferees

Assignment transfers the tenant’s entire interest under the lease; subletting transfers possession of all or part of the premises for a portion of the term; Change of Control treats indirect equity transfers as deemed assignments; Permitted Transferees carve out transfers that do not require landlord consent. The four operate as an integrated package controlling tenant’s exit options, growth flexibility, and corporate-restructuring tolerance over the term.

Tenant proposes a transfer Is it a negotiated Permitted Transferee? YES NO No consent needed notice and deal documents only; no recapture, no profit sharing The landlord’s gate Recapture landlord may take the space back; negotiate the right to withdraw the request Consent standard reasonable consent, a decision deadline, and deemed approval if the landlord sits silent Transfer premium profit sharing after tenant’s costs; the original tenant usually remains liable
The assignment play: the Permitted Transferee list is the whole game. Everything below the gate is what consent costs when you have to ask.

What the landlord’s form is doing

Landlord wants discretionary consent over any transfer that changes who occupies the premises. Goals:

Landlord prefers a sole-and-absolute-discretion consent standard with no listed criteria, no Permitted Transferees, Change of Control broadly defined (any equity change), automatic recapture or termination rights at the consent request, and full sweep of excess rent.

Landlord may also seek to make the consent obligation personal to the originally named tenant, terminate the lease on tenant’s assignment, and limit assignability of any tenant-favored special rights (renewal options, ROFOs, exclusives).

Landlord form clauses frequently embed sole-judgment carve-outs within a nominally reasonable consent standard: for example, the right to withhold consent where the proposed rent is below the rent Landlord then asks for other space in the building, or where the proposed transferee is an existing tenant, an affiliate of an existing tenant, or a prospect with whom Landlord is negotiating, and add a per-request processing fee, an additional security deposit from the transferee, and a whole-premises-only limit on subletting.

Landlord playbooks now counter tenant deemed-consent mechanics with a “reminder notice” structure: a missed response deadline does not operate as consent unless Tenant serves a second notice enclosing another copy of the transfer request and giving Landlord an additional short response period (typically five (5) days), with express warning that continued silence will be deemed consent. Landlords also charge a non-refundable processing fee for each assignment or sublease request, set high enough both to recover administrative and legal costs and to deter requests. Tenant counters: accept a reminder-notice step only if the aggregate response period remains short and definite, and cap any processing fee at Landlord’s reasonable, documented out-of-pocket costs, credited against any separate attorneys’-fee reimbursement.

What tenants should watch for

Who may take the space without consent

Permitted Transferees. Reserve a defined class of Permitted Transferees that do not require consent: (a) affiliates (entities controlling, controlled by, or under common control with tenant); (b) successors by merger, consolidation, or sale of all or substantially all assets or equity; (c) subsidiaries; (d) conversion or reorganization by operation of law.

Change of Control. Define narrowly. A "Change of Control" should mean a transfer of more than fifty percent (50%) of the voting equity of tenant to a person not previously an equity holder, excluding (i) transfers of publicly traded securities; (ii) transfers in connection with an initial public offering; (iii) intra-affiliate transfers; (iv) estate-planning transfers; and (v) employee equity issuances under approved equity plans.

Successor Corporation mechanics. The landlord bar’s published compromise permits consent-free assignment to a defined “Successor Corporation” upon not less than ten (10) business days’ prior notice (or notice within five (5) days after closing where law or the transaction terms prohibit advance notice), no default beyond applicable cure periods, and a successor net worth, determined in accordance with GAAP, at least equal to Tenant’s; the model language makes the recapture and profit-sharing sections expressly inapplicable to such transfers. Replicate each feature in the Permitted Transferee clause: the post-closing notice alternative for confidential M&A transactions, and an express statement that recapture and excess-rent sharing do not apply to any Permitted Transfer. The same source endorses a tenant “Vitiating Notice” right to withdraw a transfer request before Landlord’s recapture election takes effect, which reinforces the notice-and-withdrawal mechanic described above.

Release of assignor and guarantor. The originally named tenant remains liable after assignment absent an express release. Negotiate a release of the assignor and any guarantor upon assignment to a qualified transferee; at a minimum, provide that if Landlord and the assignee later modify or extend the Lease, the unreleased assignor’s and guarantor’s liability shall not exceed what it would have been under the original Lease, and require notice of any assignee default with an opportunity to cure.


The consent process

Consent standard. Push for a "not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed" standard, with objective criteria limiting what landlord may consider (financial condition, operating experience, compliance with use restrictions). Resist "sole and absolute discretion"; courts in many jurisdictions read good-faith limits into consent standards even where express, but a clear contract is the safer course.

Response window and deemed consent. Demand a fifteen (15) business-day response window with deemed-consent if landlord fails to respond. Tenant’s consent package should specify what information is "reasonably required" (financial statements, business plan, intended use, identity of principals).

Consent form and consent conditions. Attach the required form of landlord consent as a lease exhibit so that Landlord cannot impose new conditions at the consent stage, and bar Landlord from conditioning consent on an increase in rent, an increase in the security deposit, or delivery of a new guaranty. Strike any criterion permitting Landlord to withhold consent because the proposed sublease rent is below Landlord’s asking rent for other space; Tenant remains liable for the full rent regardless of the subrent.

Cure of underlying lease defaults. Assignment or sublease should not extinguish tenant’s right to cure landlord defaults; reserve the right to step in.

Cure right for prohibited transfers. Require notice and an opportunity to cure a transfer made in violation of the clause (including cure by rescission of the transfer) so that an inadvertent transfer does not become an incurable default.


Recapture and the price of consent

Recapture and termination. Resist recapture of the lease. If conceded, limit to recapture of the subleased portion only, exercisable only on subletting (not assignment), with a notice-and-objection mechanic that allows tenant to withdraw its consent request rather than face recapture.

Recapture mechanics. If a recapture right is conceded, require reimbursement of the unamortized cost of Tenant’s improvements, furniture, and equipment upon recapture, and negotiate a deviation tolerance so that a waived recapture right does not revive unless the final transaction economics deviate materially (for example, by more than three percent (3%)) from the terms stated in Tenant’s marketing notice.

Excess rent. Tenant should keep all proceeds from a sublease or assignment. If conceded, share excess only above tenant’s actual costs of the transfer (broker commissions, free rent, TI allowance amortized over the sublease term) and only at 50% of net excess.

Profit-sharing computation traps. Current landlord-form profit-sharing clauses define “Excess Sublease Rent” to capture disguised consideration: amounts paid for Tenant’s fixtures, leasehold improvements, equipment, and personal property in excess of the net unamortized or undepreciated cost shown on Tenant’s federal income tax returns, and charges for services provided to the subtenant in excess of fair market value, and grant Landlord the right to audit Tenant’s books, records, and federal income tax returns. Landlord counsel likewise negotiates to narrow each category of Tenant’s deductible transaction costs on an assignment (transaction fees, personal property transfers, alteration costs). Tenant counters: strike any tax-return disclosure or open-ended audit right; preserve the full slate of deductible costs, amortized over the transfer term; and compute any shared profit net of all actual transaction costs.

How this typically gets negotiated

Assignment provisions are negotiated as a package: the consent standard (reasonableness, with or without enumerated criteria), response deadlines and deemed-consent mechanics, carve-outs for affiliates and corporate transactions that need no consent at all, the equity-transfer threshold that counts as a change of control, and the landlord's recapture and profit-sharing rights. Small drafting choices here determine whether a company can be sold without landlord permission.

The specific language that resolves each of these points depends on the deal. Talk to Paul about your lease →

How the states treat it

Majority rule. Without an express reasonableness requirement, most jurisdictions imply a duty of good faith but defer to the express terms (a sole-discretion clause is largely enforced as written, subject only to a bad-faith carve-out). Where consent is conditioned on "reasonable" approval, courts apply a multi-factor test focused on financial condition, operating experience, use compliance, and the impact on the project; courts generally reject as unreasonable a landlord’s desire to capture additional rent or to recapture the space for re-leasing at higher rates.

Minority: California. California Civil Code §§ 1995.010–1995.340 (the Tenant Transfer Statute) imposes specific procedural and substantive standards on landlord refusal of consent to assignment or sublease in commercial leases. The statute codifies a reasonable-consent default rule absent an express sole-discretion clause and specifies the categories of permissible landlord considerations.

Change of Control. Most jurisdictions enforce express Change of Control provisions in commercial leases; the threshold (typically 50%) and the carve-outs (IPO, public securities) are commercially negotiated. Courts have held that "transfer of stock" or "change of ownership" language does not automatically reach indirect transfers in the absence of express deemed-assignment language.

Notable cases

Carma Developers (Cal.), Inc. v. Marathon Dev. Cal., Inc., 2 Cal 4th 342, 6 Cal Rptr 2d 467 (1992). California Supreme Court enforced an express recapture clause notwithstanding tenant’s argument that recapture was an unreasonable restraint on alienation. Establishes the line between reasonable-consent and express-recapture analyses.

Krasner v. Transcontinental Equities, Inc., 70 AD2d 312, 421 NYS2d 215 (NY App Div 1979). New York case enforcing express assignment-consent provision; useful for the proposition that absent good-faith violation, landlord’s refusal need not be elaborated.

Pantry, Inc. v. Mosley, 126 So. 3d 152, 2013 WL 1858777 (Ala. 2013). Under a consent-not-to-be-unreasonably-withheld standard, the landlord could not withhold consent to an assignment in order to extract higher rent than the lease provided; a refusal is unreasonable unless the landlord rejects a proposed assignee that fails commercially reasonable standards

Longs Drug Stores California, LLC v. DS Westgate LP, No. H046950, 2022 WL 260641, at *1 (Cal. Ct. App. Jan. 27, 2022) (unpublished). The court upheld a jury award of $338,744 against a landlord that unreasonably withheld consent to a sublease to a financially secure thrift-store operator; distaste for the proposed use is not a commercially reasonable ground for refusal

In re RGN-Grp. Holdings, LLC, No. 22-3019, 2024 WL 1110385 (3d Cir. Mar. 14, 2024). An assignor was not liable for the assignee’s breach of lease amendments executed after the assignment without the assignor’s signature or consent, notwithstanding lease language that no assignment would relieve the original tenant of liability; the ruling supports the assignor-protection language described above

Game film: real clauses from real leases

Excerpts from commercial leases filed as exhibits with the Securities and Exchange Commission, trimmed for length. Follow the citation for the full document on EDGAR.

“Tenant shall not assign this Lease or sublet the Leased Premises without the prior written consent of Landlord, which consent will not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Tenant shall have the right without the Landlord’s consent (i) to assign this Lease or sublet all or any portion of the Lease Premises to a parent, subsidiary or affiliate corporation of Tenant, a subsidiary of Tenant’s parent corporation, a successor by merger, acquisition or consolidation of Tenant, its parent or subsidiary, a corporation acquiring three (3) or more stores (including the Leased Premises) from Tenant or (ii) to assign this Lease or sublet any portion thereof to any unrelated entity with a net worth of Ten Million and 00/100 Dollars ($10,000,000) or more. … In the event of an assignment pursuant to (i) or (ii), Tenant shall be released from all obligations as Tenant under this Lease.”

Why it matters. The clause combines a reasonableness standard on landlord consent with broad no-consent transfer categories and, unusually, a full release of the original tenant after a qualifying assignment.

Amended and Restated Agreement of Lease between AL Florence Realty Holdings 2010, LLC (landlord) and Hibbett Sporting Goods, Inc. (tenant), dated October 3, 2011 (Florence, Alabama), para. 13; Ex. 10.1 to Hibbett Sports, Inc. Form 10-K, filed March 26, 2012, SEC EDGAR.
“Section 16.2 of the Original Lease is hereby amended so that Landlord’s right to recapture the portion of the Premises that is the subject of a proposed sublease, as set forth in the last sentence of Section 16.2, shall be subject to the following conditions: (i) The portion of the Premises that is the subject of a proposed sublease is greater than fifty-two percent (52%) of the total rentable area of the Premises at the time of the proposed sublease, and (ii) The proposed sublease term is either (x) two years or longer, or (y) exceeds eighty percent (80%) of the then remaining Lease Term … Under all circumstances, Landlord may not unreasonably withhold, condition, or delay its consent to a sublease or assignment by Tenant. Further, the definition of “Permitted Disposition” is hereby amended to include related entities, subsidiaries, parent companies or any other company in which Tenant has a controlling interest.”

Why it matters. This amendment shows a tenant narrowing a landlord recapture right so that it applies only to large, long subleases, while locking in a reasonableness standard and a wider class of permitted transferees for the future.

Third Amendment to Lease between HMC Mid-Market Ventures LLC (landlord) and Zendesk Inc. (tenant), dated September 11, 2013 (San Francisco, California), sec. 8; Ex. 10.11 to Zendesk, Inc. Form S-1, filed April 10, 2014, SEC EDGAR.
“Neither the Sublease nor this consent thereto shall release or discharge Tenant from any liability, whether past, present or future, under the Lease or alter the primary liability of Tenant to pay the rent and perform and comply with all of the obligations of Tenant to be performed under the Lease (including the payment of all bills rendered by Landlord for charges incurred by Subtenant for services and materials supplied to the Sublet Premises). … Landlord acknowledges and agrees that any amount paid by Subtenant under the Sublease for gross receipts or rental tax paid by Tenant to the City and County of San Francisco shall be excluded from the calculation of the Transfer Premium under and as defined in the Lease (i.e., such amounts shall not constitute rent, additional rent or other consideration payable by Subtenant in connection with the Transfer).”

Why it matters. Even with landlord consent in hand, the original tenant remains fully liable for the lease, and the parties negotiate specific items out of the Transfer Premium calculation, which is where sublease economics are won or lost.

Consent to Sublease Agreement among Hudson Rincon Center, LLC (landlord), Salesforce.com, Inc. (tenant and sublandlord), and Twilio Inc. (subtenant), dated September 25, 2018 (101 Spear Street, San Francisco, California; Sublease dated August 30, 2018), secs. 2, 4; Ex. 10.2 to Twilio Inc. Form 10-Q, filed November 8, 2018, SEC EDGAR.

Negotiating a commercial lease?

Paul Barton has negotiated hundreds of commercial leases across the United States — for tenants, landlords, and the brokers who bring them together. Get experienced counsel before you sign.