The Playbook / Clause 11

Insurance, Indemnity & Casualty

Tenant Insurance; Landlord Insurance; Mutual Indemnity; Waiver of Subrogation; Casualty Restoration

Three intertwined provisions allocate the physical and financial risk of loss between landlord and tenant. Insurance specifies what each party must carry and the certification requirements. Indemnity allocates contractual liability for third-party claims arising from each party’s use, negligence, or breach. Casualty governs what happens after fire, flood, earthquake, or other physical damage: repair, restoration, rent abatement, or termination. The three operate together as the risk-allocation backbone of the lease: a properly structured Lease should have mutual insurance, mutual indemnity, mutual waiver of subrogation, and a tenant-favored casualty restoration mechanism.

What the landlord’s form is doing

Landlord wants tenant to carry broad liability and property insurance with high limits; tenant indemnifies landlord broadly for all claims arising from tenant’s use, including (in landlord-favored forms) landlord’s ordinary negligence; landlord retains property insurance proceeds and broad discretion to restore or terminate after casualty; long restoration period; right to terminate if casualty exceeds threshold (e.g., 25% of building) or occurs in last portion of term.

Landlord may also seek: tenant payment of insurance deductibles; right to specify insurer; tenant assumption of all environmental liability; right to retain casualty proceeds for projects other than restoration; right to defer restoration indefinitely.

Landlord casualty forms also include broad escape hatches from the restoration obligation: lender election to retain insurance proceeds, damage not fully covered by insurance, damage occurring in the final months of the Term, any pending Tenant default, or Tenant vacancy, each paired with a landlord-only termination right. Tenant counsel should anticipate and narrow these exceptions, particularly the uninsured-damage and lender-election provisions.

What tenants should watch for

Insurance

Tenant insurance: limits and types. Carry Commercial General Liability (CGL) of $1M per occurrence / $2M aggregate, plus a $5M umbrella, for a $6M total minimum coverage. Resist landlord-imposed $5M/$10M base CGL; a large umbrella is more efficient. Carry all-risk property insurance at full replacement cost on Tenant’s property and Tenant’s improvements. Workers’ compensation as required by law. Business interruption insurance for at least twelve (12) months’ rent. Auto liability if Tenant operates vehicles at the Premises. Because insurance nomenclature changes over time, describe required property coverage as “special form” (the successor to “all-risk”) or such other similar coverage as is then in effect; naming an obsolete coverage form creates ambiguity at renewal.

Limits adjustment over term. Resist automatic landlord-determined increases. Allow landlord to require reasonable increase no more often than every five (5) years, based on commercially reasonable amounts for similar tenants in similar projects.

Additional insureds and certificates. Name landlord (and landlord’s lender and property manager if requested) as additional insureds on CGL. Tenant insurance is primary as to tenant’s use; landlord’s insurance is excess. Tenant delivers certificates of insurance on request and within twenty (20) days after each renewal.

Self-insurance. For large or creditworthy tenants, reserve right to self-insure the deductible portion of property and CGL with parent-company net worth above a defined threshold (e.g., $100M consolidated net worth, audited financials).

Landlord insurance. Require landlord to carry property insurance on the Premises and the Project at full replacement cost; commercial general liability on the common areas; rent loss insurance for at least twelve (12) months; flood and earthquake where reasonably available and commercially reasonable. Landlord shall name Tenant as additional insured on common-area CGL.

Premium increases attributable to the Permitted Use. Resist provisions that make Tenant responsible for increases in Landlord’s insurance rates where the increase results merely from Tenant operating under the Permitted Use.

Deductible pass-through cap. Where Landlord passes property-insurance deductibles through Operating Expenses, cap the annual pass-through at a fixed dollar amount and require amortization of any excess over the useful life of the improvements being repaired or replaced, with a commercially reasonable interest factor.

Blanket policies. Preserve Tenant’s right to satisfy its insurance obligations through a blanket policy; expect Landlord to require an endorsement specifically identifying the Premises, a minimum guaranteed per-occurrence coverage amount for the Premises, and a waiver of any pro rata distribution requirement.

Property insurance: replacement value, not “full insurable value”. The phrase “full insurable value” has no fixed meaning in the insurance industry and invites the party purchasing the coverage to procure only actual-cash-value insurance, which deducts physical depreciation and may leave restoration underfunded after a major casualty. Require property insurance at one hundred percent of replacement value (with like kind and quality restoration), whichever party carries it, so the casualty restoration obligation is actually funded.

Insurance cost pass-through formula. Where anchor tenants self-insure or carry their own policies, landlords replace the standard gross-leasable-area proration with formulas that reallocate the anchors' unreimbursed share of the landlord's insurance costs to inline tenants. Tenant counsel should require proration over the entire gross leasable area of the project, without exclusion of self-insuring or separately insured tenants' square footage from the denominator.

Deductible pass-through limits. Landlords carrying high-deductible policies attempt to pass deductibles through as operating expenses. Cap the deductibles passed through in any calendar year at a stated dollar amount, require any excess to be amortized over the useful life of the improvements repaired or replaced, and exclude deductibles attributable to landlord negligence and to earthquake, flood, and terrorism coverage unless separately negotiated.


Indemnity and subrogation

Mutual indemnity. Each party indemnifies the other for claims arising from its own negligence or willful misconduct, subject to applicable insurance and the mutual waiver of subrogation. Carve out from tenant’s indemnity: (i) landlord’s gross negligence, willful misconduct, or criminal acts; (ii) landlord’s insurance and indemnity obligations; (iii) landlord’s express representations and warranties; (iv) liabilities under any anti-indemnity statute.

Mutual waiver of subrogation. Each party waives all claims against the other to the extent the claim is or should be covered by the waiving party’s insurance. Each party shall include a waiver-of-subrogation endorsement in its property policy. Insurance carriers must consent in writing.

Repair chargebacks versus waiver of subrogation. Landlord repair clauses commonly charge Tenant for any damage caused directly or indirectly by Tenant or its invitees, including roof damage attributed to Tenant’s rooftop equipment; unless expressly made subject to the mutual waiver of subrogation, these fault-based chargebacks effectively void the waiver as to insured casualty losses. Make every repair-cost chargeback expressly subject to the waiver of subrogation.


Casualty

Casualty: restoration obligation. Landlord shall restore the Premises if damage is less than fifty percent (50%) of the replacement cost of the Building, with restoration to substantially the same condition as before the casualty (or as required by current code). For damage between 50% and 75%, both parties have termination rights with notice within sixty (60) days of casualty. For damage in excess of 75%, lease automatically terminates unless both parties agree to restoration.

Casualty: rent abatement. Tenant’s rent abates proportionally from the date of casualty based on the area of Premises unusable; abatement continues until Substantial Completion of restoration. If Substantial Completion is not achieved within twelve (12) months of casualty, Tenant may terminate the Lease by written notice; if within eighteen (18) months, Landlord may terminate.

Casualty: late-term termination. Tenant has the right to terminate after any casualty occurring in the last eighteen (18) months of the Lease Term (or last twelve (12) months if exercise of any Renewal Option is feasible), to avoid the burden of restoration for a short remaining period.

Casualty: insurance proceeds. Property insurance proceeds shall be applied to restoration. Tenant retains rights to proceeds for Tenant’s improvements paid by Tenant (including TI Allowance disbursements to the extent Tenant has not been credited). Landlord may not retain insurance proceeds for purposes other than restoration without Tenant’s consent.

Casualty: restoration of Tenant’s improvements. After restoration of the Building shell by Landlord, Tenant restores Tenant’s improvements using Tenant’s insurance proceeds. If Tenant’s improvements were paid by Landlord (TIA), Landlord restores those at Landlord’s cost.

Casualty rent abatement: endpoint definition. Landlord casualty forms terminate rent abatement at the earlier of (i) the tenant's taking possession of any part of the unusable space for any purpose or (ii) substantial completion of restoration, and reduce the abatement proportionately as portions of the space are restored. Tenant counsel should tie the abatement endpoint to restoration sufficient for the conduct of Tenant's business in the affected portion, define substantial completion objectively, and preserve the abatement during any emergency or temporary re-entry into the damaged space.

How this typically gets negotiated

Negotiation here is about symmetry and matching risk to insurance: mutual indemnities rather than one-way ones, mutual waivers of subrogation so each side's insurer bears its own loss, insurance requirements the tenant can actually place, and casualty provisions with hard restoration deadlines and a tenant termination right when the building cannot be restored in time.

The specific language that resolves each of these points depends on the deal. Talk to Paul about your lease →

How the states treat it

Casualty restoration. Common-law restoration obligation absent express provision is shared; express provisions govern. Most jurisdictions enforce contractual termination thresholds and restoration deadlines. Tenant counsel should ensure deadlines are linked to substantial completion (not just commencement of work).

Majority rule. Mutual indemnity, mutual waiver of subrogation, and restoration with specified deadlines are the negotiated norm in commercial leases. Insurance limits scale with deal size and tenant credit; large public tenants self-insure deductibles.

Notable cases

Continental Ins. Co. v. Kennerson, 661 So 2d 325 (Fla DCA 1995). Illustrative of mutual waiver-of-subrogation enforcement in commercial leases.

Sutton v. Jondahl, 532 P2d 478 (Okla Ct App 1975). Foundational authority for mutual waiver of subrogation in landlord-tenant context (the "Sutton doctrine").

Bass Pro Outdoor World LLC v. Harrisburg Mall (Pa. Super. Ct. 2023). The court enforced a tenant-negotiated reverse indemnity requiring the landlord to indemnify the tenant for all claims arising from the common areas “except for the negligent acts of Tenant,” holding that the exception required actual negligence rather than mere allegations and awarding the tenant its defense costs; a model precedent for tenant-side common-area indemnification

Game film: real clauses from real leases

Excerpts from commercial leases filed as exhibits with the Securities and Exchange Commission, trimmed for length. Follow the citation for the full document on EDGAR.

“The parties release each other, and their respective authorized representatives, from any claims for damage to any person or to the Premises and to the fixtures, personal property, Tenant’s improvements, and alterations of either Landlord or Tenant in or on the Premises that are caused by or result from risks insured against under any insurance policies carried by the parties and in force at the time of any such damage. Each party shall cause each insurance policy obtained by it to provide that the insurance company waives all right of recovery by way of subrogation against either party in connection with any damage covered by any policy. Neither party shall be liable to the other for any damage caused by fire or any of the risks insured against under any insurance policy required by this Lease.”

Why it matters. A mutual release paired with a waiver of subrogation keeps each side's insurer from suing the other party after a loss, and tenants should confirm the waiver is truly mutual and endorsed on both policies because a one way version leaves the tenant exposed to the landlord's carrier.

Lease dated December 29, 1997, between Robert Arthur Gomes and Robert Paul Gomes (landlord) and Copart of Connecticut, Inc. (tenant) (approximately 40 acres, Town of Brookhaven, Suffolk County, New York), Section 13.3; Ex. 10.6 to Copart, Inc. Form 10-K, filed Oct. 29, 2002, SEC EDGAR.
“If the Premises are damaged or destroyed by fire, earthquake or any other casualty to such an extent as to render the same untenantable in whole or in substantial part greater than 70% (“Substantial Casualty”), Tenant shall give Landlord immediate notice of the occurrence of any such casualty. Unless Landlord, within sixty (60) days after receipt of such notice, notifies Tenant of its election to repair or to restore the Premises, this Lease shall terminate at the end of such sixty (60) day period and Tenant's liability for Rent shall cease as of the day following the casualty … Landlord shall have two hundred seventy (270) days to complete the restoration after it notifies Tenant of Landlord’s intent to restore the Premises. … In the event of a Substantial Casualty, Tenant shall have the option to terminate this Lease by notice to the Landlord given within sixty (60) days of the date of such Substantial Casualty …”

Why it matters. This clause gives the tenant the three casualty protections that matter most, a defined damage threshold, a hard outside date for the landlord's restoration, and the tenant's own termination right, rather than leaving every post-casualty decision to the landlord.

Industrial Lease Agreement (Clinton Commerce Park) executed May 22, 2020, between Clinton Commerce III, LLC (landlord) and Haemonetics Corporation (tenant), Section 9.01; Ex. 10.1 to Haemonetics Corporation Form 10-Q, filed Aug. 4, 2020, SEC EDGAR.
“Tenant shall have the option to terminate this Lease in the event any of the following occurs, which option may be exercised only by delivery to Landlord of a written notice of election to terminate within seven (7) days after Tenant receives from Landlord the estimate of the time needed to complete such restoration: A. The Premises are damaged by any peril and, in the reasonable opinion of Landlord's architect or construction consultant, the restoration of the Premises cannot be substantially completed within two hundred seventy (270) days after the date of such damage; or B. The Premises are damaged by any peril within twelve (12) months of the last day of the Lease Term and in the reasonable opinion of Landlord's architect or construction consultant the restoration of the Premised cannot be substantially completed within sixty (60) days after the date of such damage.”

Why it matters. The tenant termination trigger here turns on the estimate of the landlord's own architect rather than on actual repair progress, and the seven day exercise window is short, so tenants should seek a termination right that also applies when restoration in fact overruns the stated period.

Lease Agreement dated as of October 31, 1997, between Sycal Properties, Inc. (landlord) and Century Theatres, Inc. (tenant) (150 Pelican Way, San Rafael, California), Section 12.3; Ex. 10.37(a) to Cinemark Holdings, Inc. Form S-1/A, filed Apr. 19, 2007, SEC EDGAR.

Negotiating a commercial lease?

Paul Barton has negotiated hundreds of commercial leases across the United States — for tenants, landlords, and the brokers who bring them together. Get experienced counsel before you sign.